European Court of Human Rights building

Research Lab at University College London

Not everyone can reach human rights justice.

We are an interdisciplinary team of scholars and practitioners studying international human rights courts and tribunals — who gets heard, what remedies follow, and whether states change their behaviour.

1 million

Claims and judgments analysed

4

International and regional human rights systems

~100

States under study

45+

Publications by our team

Two questions we are asking

View all projects →
Break the Bias / Access to Justice
01

Break the Bias / Access to Justice

This ERC-funded project looks at how victims access international human rights courts and treaty bodies. We study inequality in access to understand which groups obtain protection and which fall through the cracks.

Read more →
Human Rights Nudge / Compliance and Remedies
02

Human Rights Nudge / Compliance and Remedies

This ERC-funded project studies execution of human rights judgments across the Council of Europe. We look at past cases of human rights violations to understand when judicial decisions lead to a change in states' behaviour.

Read more →

What we are finding

Read the research →

Admissibility decides more than merits

A large share of claims never reaches a substantive hearing. Admissibility criteria filter out precisely the claimants the system says it protects.

States learn from each other

Compliance is not only a bilateral matter between a court and a state. Governments observe how their peers respond to adverse judgments and calibrate accordingly.

Remedies shape behaviour

Damages alone rarely produce reform. The design of the remedy — individual, general, or community-wide — predicts whether a violation recurs.

Recent publications

All publications →